OPPURTUNISTIC POLITICS

It is good that debate took place over F.D.I issue in parliament in which voting took place as well. But nuances of politics have shown their distorted image. Especially two of the major stakeholder political parties have shown to public not at least good image. Public could not digest of this significant thing that both of them with much assertion put their view on the floor of parliament against government move but when time came to vote then both of them felt it right to abstain from voting on untenable the pretext. Both of them ditched of their holding both ethos and principal. What sort of politics is being brought into exercise by these parties? At least, I can not relate myself to put view by these two parties. So far as concerned to me, I am not opposing of chose move of government for it will certainly bring major change in life of people. This is going to become a source of employment to people. In reciprocal way and in good gesture, other countries would also open their domestic market. Thus, employment opportunities may become available in other countries. Other Opposition parties are meaninglessly opposing instead of supporting of this. Over and above, this is not good thing as myself have also seen of those days when opposition parties of todays have also made the live of people miserable over the issue of liberalisation, computerisation and so on. But result is what can be sensed right now. One thing can be summed up that principal and ethos is the things of rudiment so far as in view of those of two parties. No reliance can be placed upon these parties whereof there is no laid down direction and vision of future. It is wrong to reach at conclusion that this will be like open gate way for introduction of East India Company in our country. It is very vital to state that we can not live in isolation and we, people shall have to understand of delicate intricacies of market of world. Anyway, we should not forget that present economy is passing through the phase of much jeopardy.

INDER KUMAR GUJRAL

There was much turmoil and upheaveal, when he became prime minister. But, within very short span of time, he established his control over every thing irrespective of fact that he remained prime minister for short duration. He contributed a lot especially in foreign policy of which people welcomed a lot. There was much humbleness and intellectualism in him.Like Kalam, he is an icon who inspired million and million of peole. People of this country will ever miss him a lot.

AN INTROSPECTION

On the eve of independence day, I was looking back and pondering about gone by those of days, when our country became independent and what sort of purporting things had to sacrifice for getting of this independence. Two distinct things made their instant flash in my mind i.e one as to Gandhi and other about Jinnah.Two of them have been tallest international personalities of their time and both of them led the movement spectacularly as per their iconic way. Nevertheless, there has ever wide and polar difference between having personalities of both of them.

As and when looks at Jinnah then there is a halo appears around the personalities of Jinnah of which it is very difficult for common man to understand. Undoubtedly, Jinnah personality was reflecting of a high aristocratic intellectual person who ever lived very westernized. He lived his life on his laid down term and never negotiated with his way of life.He had very broad intellectual but common people did not come under this ambit. One ever perceive of clash of ego, when one looks at Jinnah. Had he been alive today then he would be sad to see the trait and overall facet of our neighbor country. Jinnah never thought to carve of Pakistan in such a way which is appearing today. Jinnah personally was a secular person. In fact, Jinnah was very modern person who did not bring in his life of muslim culture despite of being a muslim.

On the other hand, Gandhi ever belived in simplicity and ever involved himself with common people.He lived and spoke the languaze of common people.Even his sole mantra was to accommodate even of opponent whilst leading movement against British Raj.There is much involvement of the cardinal principle of non – violence which makes him very exceptional and unique. He will be ever remembered with profound aweful gratefulness for this and coming generation across the countries will ever bow of their head. But, one thing strike oftenly in mind that had Gandhi been alive today would he be happy to see the state of affairs of our country.As per me, he would not be happy even a bit because in our country Gandhi is remembered for conducting of national ritual but sadly his laid ideal paramount notion and way of governance have never been followed by those who are in power. But being ever optimistic, I visualize beacon of ray of light even today.

Movement Against Corruption

There was much enthusiasm, when Anna and his team sat on Dharna but this movement lost its sheen due to non – coordination and non- coherence.Ultimately, this team adopted of a thing to which there was a constant avoidance.People had high hope but this has been let down. Anna team has been exploring of face saving formulae.If this was the motive of team Anna then this should have been adopted very beginning. Then, what was the need to sit on dharna when there was an alternative available.